|
|
|
|
|
by shoguning
2030 days ago
|
|
Yeah, that is mentioned as "one of the downsides of renewables". That is like saying, "one of the downsides of using a cooked noodle as a fork is that it doesn't hold its shape". It's disqualifying until that issue is sorted. The value of solar right now is that it provides energy at the hottest, most energy use part of the day. But there is a tipping point where marginal solar is not really valuable for a grid anymore. California and Germany are at that point. Hopefully we get cost-effective day-scale energy storage, it's not going to happen in the next few years unfortunately. |
|
And people overestimate how much storage costs. In Texas, even with super cheap natural gas, there are more GW of storage in the interconnection queue than there are of natural gas plants. That's at today's prices, in a market where everybody competes on their own costs!
https://rmi.org/clean-energy-is-canceling-gas-plants/
And greater than 95% of new solar projects in California include storage, and something like 25% of projects outside of California include storage along with the renewables.
https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/hybrid-power-pl...
We don't absolutely need to deploy storage right now, but independent agents are still doing it, because they make money by deploying storage at current costs.