(I mean so does heavy taxation of capital ~hoarders~ holders, to be redistributed among the country's labor base, who will then tend to spend it immediately on goods or personal investment, but we don't talk about that.
OR
The point of liquidity is to get people doing things, but the status quo today seems more like giant firms trading above our heads to manage the risk of rent-seeking on an increasingly precariously-positioned consumer class.)
Neither of his points seem based on Economic dogma shoved down your throat during undergrad.
was flagged, as it was neither inflammatory nor uncouth, but I agree with it. You seem to have an entirely elementary conception of the market and an inability to understand the ways those assumptions have fallen apart in the face of market and regulatory conditions.
OR
The point of liquidity is to get people doing things, but the status quo today seems more like giant firms trading above our heads to manage the risk of rent-seeking on an increasingly precariously-positioned consumer class.)