[yawaramin]

A couple of the questions were multiple-choice, e.g.:

> If I was granted one new language feature today, I would ask for:

They commented about it:

> This was a tough question because only one choice was allowed, and the order in which the choices were listed may have influenced the replies. In retrospect, multiple choices presented in a randomized order would have been better.

This is actually one of my pet peeves about many surveys (and indeed, electoral systems)--they often use single-choice answer format (plurality voting i.e. radio button) when they should really be using multi-choice format (approval voting i.e. checkboxes). I said as much when the results were initially announced:

> There’s no reason to restrict the question to only one option, and allowing multiple choices (i.e., approval voting), allows people to express preferences in a more nuanced way so you get a more accurate overall view of what the community is interested in.

(from https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-ocaml-user-survey-2020/6624/... )