[ordu]

> Without getting too philosophical, I think we can agree that there are "rules" how the universe works...

Well, maybe I am too philosophical, because I feel myself reluctant to agree. I accept science method because I know nothing better. But I doubt the idea, that there are no possibility to invent something better.

> we have no all-encompassing explanation of the universe that concludes R = U/I for electric circuits

I'm not a physicist to argue with it. But somewhere deep inside me I see R = U/I as a tautology too. R, U and I was defined by a way, that made R=U/I true. There is some information about the universe encoded in this rule, but there also information about us there. How to separate information about the universe from information about us?