|
|
|
|
|
|
by galaxyLogic
2035 days ago
|
|
|
Well you have an eye for objectivity. Many people don't. And whenever there are two conflicting versions of a story it sows some doubt on both of them. We know this from politics already. So from a pure PR and game-theoretic standpoint I think they made the right (pro-active) move. |
|
|
The NYT is far from objective, so this may actually work.