|
|
|
|
|
by codezero
2035 days ago
|
|
Very much agree, this is a fishing expedition where you can come to pretty much any conclusion. 1. the regions of sky that the signal might have come from are huge, and contain tons of stars.
2. he's basically just sifting through all the stars in a huge area of space and looking for ones with Sol like parameters. That's not science, but that said, it doesn't mean we shouldn't have a look and listen at the star if it really is a great candidate. When Kepler started returning data, so much of it was unexpected that at the very least now we have a star name that if future scientists are looking to compare their data set with other findings, they may see "oh this 2mass star was hypothesized to be the wow signal by a crank, but we just found X there!" It's tricky of course, because it's hard for a normal person (I am assuming) to tell the difference between some dude who uploads a neat thing to arXiv and someone who stakes their career and livelihood on the science they produce. |
|