|
|
|
|
|
by _boffin_
2038 days ago
|
|
This is a great start, but there's a huge portion of data you're just flat out missing from this--comments. There's so much useful information inside user comments. I have a theory that I'm truthfully too lazy to test out, but I'm presuming that lower quality videos are going to have an average comment text complixicity number lower than the higher quality videos, especially as your topic gets more specific/technical. Take a look textstat(1) for some examples. (1). https://github.com/shivam5992/textstat |
|
The carwow channel for example is definitely asking to answer stupid debates in the comments to improve its ranking. The vilebrequin channel does the same but as a joke and explain that it's to improve the ranking. The community then write a lot of long and stupid comments to improve the ranking.