[AnthonyMouse]

By this logic someone who wants to change an existing game that allows same sex marriage to be one that doesn't is a "liberal" because they're advocating a change to the status quo.

But if we take this as a given then the original claim doesn't make sense anymore, because in the original claim "conservative" essentially means Republican, but the Republicans would be the "liberals" in many cases under your framework. And yet we don't really see employees pressuring companies to implement mandatory drug testing or to refuse to hire H1B workers or stop offering healthcare plans that cover abortion, even though those would all be divergences from the status quo in many companies.

[geofft]

No, they're a reactionary instead of a conservative. It's just that there are very few reactionaries in the world (or at least employed reactionaries), for some reason.