[mgkimsal]

> "Sure, I could make an extra 10% every year, but would that make me happier than working from home, on my own terms?"

If it allows you to provide more ('stuff', or security, or stability) for a family, then yes, it might make you happier.

I read articles like this and they mostly tend to be from the perspective of younger people and/or folks without families to support.

An extra 10% pay increase, over just a few years, provides more general savings, perhaps buys solid life insurance, helps pad savings for future education, or moving expenses to fund a job/life change, etc.

Another nugget - "Know your worth". It's not bad advice, but something the author didn't mention was understanding how your worth is determined. You can do the exact same work for company A and company B. Company A may be able to extract huge value from your work, and company B may struggle to keep the lights on. When working for someone else, "your worth" is directly related to how capable they are at operating their business profitably.

I've no doubt the author's views work for him, and probably many people like him, but as with most posts like this, they're not universal.

[davzie]

As someone with a family, my preference is that I can work from home to be around my family more. I feel this is more valuable to them than some more money in our savings account but that’s just me. To each their own!

[mgkimsal]

Had a colleague die a few years ago. He'd lost some project work, and let his life insurance lapse. Had a heart attack just a few weeks later, and left a wife and 3 kids with very little. He worked from home and spent time with them, but had hit a point where money was a problem. The story sticks with me because he'd contacted me just a couple months before he died asking if I had any work/referrals, and I had nothing at that time.

The older I get, the more I see less the great outcomes when adversity hit people I know (whether death or illness or some other big hit). Money isn't everything, but in many of those cases, having an extra $k saved up would indeed help smooth people through those rough patches. I'm actually amazed at how many folks work for decades, then something happens, and there's a gofundme set up for the family to help with day to day bills.

If you have all your financial ducks in a row, everyone is comfortable, and you have the life you want, that's great. To each their own, indeed! :)

[joelbluminator]

Well everyone would agree that generally more income is good. But cutting 10-20% on your income for a better job in terms of work life balance, interest or whatever else could be worth it for many people. Is there really that much difference between someone making 80K and someone making 100K? In a country like the U.S, where you can potentially lose your health insurance and sending your kids to college is super expensive - then maybe. In Europe the difference is gonna be only what kind of car you drive and how big your house is. In terms of your health, your kids opportunities in life etc, it doesn't matter that much.

[ant6n]

You can also get a smaller house/Apartment, which young kids probably won’t mind, and have the less paying job that allows you more tone with family. That may also reduce the chance of heart attack, btw.

[deckard1]

> I'm actually amazed at how many folks work for decades, then something happens, and there's a gofundme set up for the family to help with day to day bills.

Not to go all Bernie Sanders on you, but... welcome to America?

Maybe you don't live in the US. But here in the US, a single medical bill can wipe you out. And because we value free market healthcare, that means you don't know what the price will be until after you receive treatment. You won't know if you're covered or denied coverage until after the incident. Because that's how the Free Market(tm) works.

Be thankful if you've never had the luxury of spending months battling a massive bill you received because one of the ten random people you saw one night in a hospital was out-of-network despite being at an in-network hospital.

You don't have to be a full blown socialist to see how fucked America is.

[mgkimsal]

I do live in America, and possibly should have qualified that statement. The folks I was referring to were already ... middle class or higher, who understood the value of savings/insurance, and had ample opportunity to do so, and still didn't. That's what sort of... gets me. Situations where people were never earning enough to be able to remotely prepare for financial setbacks... I don't include them in my "amazement" comment. I'm generally "amazed" they manage to survive at all in today's world.

I've not quite had the situation you've mentioned with medical stuff, but have had some ER visits which end up costing thousands out of pocket on top of the ~$10k/year we spend on insurance.

For people I've known who were in software, or engineering, or law, and had high-paying careers over decades, to know they were still living that close to the edge financially, that's what amazes me. And sometimes it's bad spending habits (or drugs, or whatever), sometimes it's just poor financial education.

But to the original point - an extra ~10% year in income to many folks - even if it means a slightly reduced 'quality of life' by some measure - can have an impact on their lives down the road, but they also need to manage that extra income properly.

[edbob]

US health care does not even resemble a free market system. Every incentive is perverted by the government, starting with the tax code practically forcing insurance to be tied to employers.

[joelbluminator]

Hmm 10% sounds quite negligible in terms of security/stability etc. Way more important, for you and your family, to be happy with your work than to provide 10% more income imo.