|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway7281
2033 days ago
|
|
|
If you have me guess, what the effect of low access to resources is (time, money, health, job, anything) I will bet having lower resources will have an adverse effect - because that is kind of the definition of it. When I read these studies, I'm thinking that this "fact" is disputed and low access to resource may have positive effects - which is ridiculous. A kind of second order implication of this is that it's more important to research the problem than to solve it (I know you need to understand the problem first, but I think it is not that complicated). |
|
|
Being critical in a scientific context shouldn’t be wrong. True, it might be hard to balance.
> it's more important to research the problem than to solve it
Yes, I’d say research is the necessary first step.
Human intuition can always be wrong. Regardless, the results of a research can provide useful pointers about next steps.