|
|
|
|
|
by tuna-piano
2043 days ago
|
|
My theory is that anti vaxxers have poisoned the public conversation (if you say anything questioning a vaccine you shall be shunned). I plan to get this vaccine and generally trust our scientific institutions. But of course there are legitimate safety concerns with injecting stuff into people - which is why they ran a huge study to show that there are no short term safety concerns. I'm just asking (not implying anything) a real medical question I don't know the answer to - how do we know this vaccine doesn't increase the chances of some condition 20 years later when the median time people have been vaccinated is two months? And with a brand new vaccine platform that has never been used before... |
|
Also, that governments will show little patience for anti-vax talk of its citizens. They'll have to switch talking points from avoiding panic (It's harmless for young people!) to accepting the vaccine (There are many long-term effects of infection!). A Herculean effort in balancing propaganda with allowing free speech.
If nothing else, it is going to be interesting watching the next months unfold. Saying you are refusing the vaccine may simply put you on a list, but openly detracting from the vaccination efforts, should see some actual (and scary) pushback.
Public health will be an increasingly difficult thing to manage, when individuals get the information for their decisions online (however wrong).