|
|
|
|
|
by 0dmethz
2036 days ago
|
|
I don't really understand this point of view. WSL2 is faster and works better in almost every way. As a developer I absolutely love it and it has changed my workflow completely. I haven't run into any limitations that kept me from doing what I wanted to do with it, and some minor adjustments like using wsl2host helps bridge any gaps. What did we sacrifice along the way? Well, apparently we can't change our Windows network config or see Windows processes through Linux tools that weren't designed for it anyway. And we want that sort of thing because, it's, uhh, "cool"? Those priorities don't make sense to me, but maybe I don't fully understand what people want to do with it. |
|