|
|
|
|
|
by tptacek
2043 days ago
|
|
It makes sense in this instance, as the rule is designed to minimize the number of people whose lives will be ruined (and thrown to the state to support) by bad investing decisions, and the asset requirement both minimizes the likelihood of any one investor losing their shirt, and minimizes the number of investors. And again: the real teeth in this rule are about who issuers can market securities to, not about what random people are allowed to do. |
|
Bad investing decisions have always and will always be allowed.