|
|
|
|
|
by redvenom
2044 days ago
|
|
This response is not quite right. "It's only completeness [...]" sentence does not make sense. CH is independent of ZFC, period, as proved by Cohen. Talking about 'semantic level' does not make sense. CH is an example of the incompleteness of ZFC. There are models of ZFC in which CH is true and models in which CH is false. |
|
For specific example, what is a model of ZFC? Is it just another theory, one which includes ZFC and few more axioms? Why not call it a derived theory or a subset theory?