[leftyted]

> Are any of them advocating the seizure of the means of production for the workers? Abolish the state or private property? Devolve control into local worker's councils or other non-hierarchical means of decision-making?

Are any of them arguing for an ethnostate? For shipping non-whites "back to where they came from"? For re-establishing anti-miscegenation laws?

Your perspective is absurd. Of course the court has a left wing. It's just not radical enough for your liking and, similarly, the court's right wing isn't radical enough for David Duke's liking.

[jaggederest]

Concentration camps and prison slavery not right wing enough for you? Just because it's commonplace here doesn't mean it's not extremely right wing. I don't think we need to get to full scale ethnic cleansing to be considered right wing. Voter disenfranchisement alone is something you rarely see outside of full on authoritarian dictatorships.

[pmoriarty]

"Are any of them arguing for an ethnostate? For shipping non-whites "back to where they came from"? For re-establishing anti-miscegenation laws?"

Don't kid yourself. This is exactly what they're after. Another couple of elections of the likes of Trump and they may get it.

[leftyted]

We're talking about supreme court justices...

[pmoriarty]

Many of whom have been appointed by and with the support of people who have that very agenda.

The only debate among conservatives is over whether they should be overtly racist, like Trump, or covertly racist, like his predecessors.

If they get enough power, the velvet glove will slip from the iron fist.