[everythingswan]

I want to know if I'm reading this wrong because our conclusions were different. It feels like they tested whether additional mentorship worked, it didn't, but their conclusion was that the "interventions" worked on both groups.

From the "Findings" [1]

>> In this randomized clinical trial of 1028 participants with high-risk intermediate glycemic categories, the intervention significantly reduced the 2-year risk of type 2 diabetes by 40% to 47%, although lay volunteer support did not reduce the risk further. For every 11 participants treated, 1 diabetes diagnosis was prevented.

I took it to mean that the support added no additional benefit: both groups benefited from the treatment and the group treated with and volunteers did not outperform the control.

[1] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articl...