[Ericson2314]

Tell that to the ton of wildlife around everything but the refactor proper?

And also even taking your argument at face value, I fully believe a handful of 20,000 year dead zones would be superior to global warming at our current rate. The alternative we get now is way more than 20,000 years of wrecked biodiversity almost everywhere.

How is the orange website so full of self-avowed rationalists so incapable of comparing sudden and quick vs slow and steady harm...

[luibelgo]

Point is, current energy sources can be stopped and reworked, once you go with nuclear disaster you assume the 20k year scenario. Tell me you won't change your opinion in that time span.

[Ericson2314]

"can be" isn't good enough. There's a lot of stuff we could do, but won't. I'll take my chances with the nuclear powerplants, thank you.

[luibelgo]

Don't take mine, please