[lhnz]

  > Freedom of speech does not exclude the possibility
  > of explicitly labeling certain speech as wrong,
  > and what twitter is doing here is definitely better 
  > than removing tweets outright.

Yes, I agree with this.

I disagreed with how the person I was responding to was formulating free speech, but think that there must be some middle path where we can be clear about why certain messages have disclaimers, and why certain people get banned, and what will get you banned, and how to get your account back if you've done nothing wrong, etc.

I also think that right now people complain about shadow-bans and so on, and I think these things are dangerous because they make people feel that authorities are conspiring against them.