Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dimva 2053 days ago
$3.7 million sounds like a lot of money, but he could have earned more than that over 7 years if he just took a mid-level job at a FAMANG company.

EDIT: saw that the founder lives in Birmingham, Alabama. So yes, $3.7 million IS a lot of money.

6 comments

It averages out to $420k/yr. There's this sentiment on HN that "all you have to do" is get a job at a big tech company and you'll make a million dollars a year. It's idiotic, and not true. Yes, there are people who make $500k+ writing code in a cubicle for 40 hours a week. They are the vast, vast, vast minority compared to the people a) making $100-200k doing the same thing; b) making that $500k+ doing everything but writing code.

Unless you're doing infrastructure stuff at Netflix, ad work at FB or Google, or some high level stuff at Microsoft you're not making half a million a year, and you're not doing it at a mid-level anything, anywhere.

As a Belgian, I can't help but look at these numbers in disbelief. 100-200k/annum for churning out code 40 hours a week? Where do I sign up for this? I'm the best paid employee I know, work insane hours, and I'm not even in that bracket.

Addendum: it's very rare to make more than twice the average wage in Belgium as an employee. It's a different matter if you're self employed.

As a Belgian myself: self-employment is the key here. It's not that hard to pull in 100-200K annually in the current belgian tech space, I've done it consistently for the past 5 years, with lots of periods where I did not work full time.
In the US at least, as a contractor, you have to make a lot more in gross pay to come out equivalent to what you'd earn at a lower salary somewhere else. You have to cover:

* Health Insurance

* No paid time off: Want 4 weeks off a year? That's a 7.6% reduction in pay.

* You have to pay both the employee & employer side of payroll taxes

* You're not eligible for unemployment, so you need to save more money to cover that possibility

* No retirement fund so you don't get any matching funds and have to really be on top of what your long term needs are and take that off the top of your income.

As an example, I have a normal salary full-time job, but I also have a hobby business on the side. The money I make from that given the tax bracket I'm in, federal, state, payroll taxes, means my "take home" pay from is taxed around 43%. And that's without needing to take anything extra out of it for paid time off, health insurance, or retirement, all of which are well covered by my salaried position.

Any advice on how to get there? I'm a contractor after having worked full time for a few years. Working with a very few long term clients, just me.

Is your daily rate very high, are you delegating work to other people, or what is it?

I'm working in Belgium as well and really wondering what space you were working now because 100K-200K net is way above developer wages here.
Did you have to specialize in some kind of technology or sector? Or is it simply because self-employment means paying less taxes?
Same here in the UK.

I know a couple of guys in the UK who are essentially just coding all day, in full time jobs, making £100k a year.

BUt it's very rare IMO, I'm not even on 50% of that.

In the UK you could make good money but the trick is to be a consultant and bill your employer through your Limited company.

At one place where I worked with a permanent contract, the consultants were billing at 800-1200 gbp per day depending on seniority. There was agency cut of course but overall they made real well. this is when working at the same office at the same hours right next to me, just like an employee.

I haven’t been in the UK since a while so I hear that now things changed so you can no longer pretend to run a company when being essentially an employee.

I haven’t been in the UK since a while so I hear that now things changed so you can no longer pretend to run a company when being essentially an employee.

That's actually been the case for about 20 years now. The relevant term is "IR35".

Hmm, I have been driving relatively fast lately. must be the relativistic speeds that 20 years is not the same for both of us!

Anyway, apparently the changes are postponed to April 2021 at stationery frame of reference: https://www.taylorhopkinson.com/ir35/

It depends on the industry.

I'm graduating this year, and many of my friends (and myself) are going to work for FANG+ and finance companies and hitting that figure.

In London?
Yep.
I am always deeply suspicious of the figures on that site. Right now, I'm looking at a L4 at Google, in London, listing $367K total comp at 0 years of experience.
Figures for my company are spot on, so I assume that they are correct for other ones as well. Usually base salary for a given level is set (you can see that majority of entries have very similar base salary if you remove outliers). Bonus is usually preset as % of base salary and therefore will be same/similar for most people. What could make difference are RSUs. If you are coming from another FAANG or startup and leaving behind lot of unvested stock, you might get that matched. Or if you have other offers they will prefer to increase RSUs rather than base salary. Every year you then get refresher RSUs which are quite significant (as big as your base salary but spread over 4 years).
You need to move to Silicon Valley for that, but cost of living and lose of other benefits of living in Belgium might outweight the higher paid. You can try Switzerland if you want 6 digits salary in Europe.
Be aware that tech salaries in the US are roughly twice what you get in Europe (and most other parts of the world). So don't be too shocked.

https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/16/coding-salaries-in-201...

Google in Switzerland my friend.

Or generally contract work in Switzerland.

This year for a brief, beautiful moment(two months) I was making 750CHF daily before taxes.

Regular, experienced employees can count on 100k+ before taxes.

As a freelancer in Paris, I've been invoicing 625€ daily in 2018 and 2019, and 700€ in 2020, doing Big Data / Scala development with a sprinkle of devops, for the same customer. I think I could get 800-900€ if I find a customer that pays better and focus on the Big Data / GCP sectors. Just need to find a contract through word of mouth, and not through a recruiter that takes a 100-150€ margin...

You get less as a salaried employee in France though...

Become a contractor, you'll be in the 100 to 200k/year. (ok yes, that's before taxes)
>Where do I sign up for this?

In California

>it's very rare to make more than twice the average wage in Belgium as an employee

Yep, software engineer compensation is crap in the EU, while the cost of living is almost as high as in Silicon Valley. Solution? Apply for H1B at a FAANG. Fuck the EU.

>Fuck the EU.

Yeah? Well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

In my experience, most engineers, even those fresh out of college, land at above 300k within a few years at Google/FB. You do not need to be a rockstar, and you don't need to work more than 40 hours/week for that (though that can depend on team, I've never encountered one that regularly asks for more than that).

If you're talking finances, Google/Facebook will pay you more, with less risk, and better work life balance than pretty much all startups. There are entirely justifiable reasons to prefer a startup, but you should take a second look at your calculations if you think finances come out favorable on the startup side.

Not necessarily true. I was a mid level product engineer at a recently IPOd company (joined 2 years pre IPO). My base salary was $200k, and the stock and bonus more than doubled that.

There was a little bit of “pick the rocket ship” gamble - I had an Uber offer that probably would have been ended more like $250k/year, but it’s not unreasonable to get half a mill joining a late stage pre-IPO startup, and base salary is high enough you do it with little risk.

Hell, I know some mid-level post-IPO folks at Square making $700k due to it 10xing in share price.

I don't work in FAANG, but I know someone who works at a 1 tier lower big company. He is a mid level engineer. After 1 year at the company - Salary + Monthly vesting comes in at somewhere between 400-450K depending on how the stock performs, and he certainly has room to grow.

I was told FAANG-ers make even more than him, so yeah I tend to believe these numbers.

To make those figures doing "ad work" at FB or Google you probably have to come in as a VP or higher, which already comes towards the end of a very long career arc.
Not necessarily. Bear in mind Facebook's compensation is heavily performance orientated, the bonuses can rack up. You can easily clear $500k at Facebook as a senior engineer, especially if you're getting high evaluations.
Fair enough, I'm talking about the non software engineering side of ad tech.
This is untrue. A Level 6 Engineer or Manager and higher makes $500k+

VPs likely make millions.

Highly inaccurate. Even if you look at the data provided there, it’s 2 data points with an insane spread.

Check out levels.fyi for something more accurate. You’ll see L6 engineers make $500K+.

So even more pessimistic than my already prone-to-pessimism self thought!
Google L5 is $331K a year according to Levels.fyi Eleven years. L6 is half a mil a year. L3 is new grad. L5 is not superhuman. It’s not mid level but it’s not Staff Engineer either, “just” competent and known to be capable of working with minimal direction. FAANG really do pay very, very well.
So true. I could have also hated my life for those 7 years. I make a terrible employee. :)
That assumes he took no salary or dividends for 7 years, which seems highly unlikely given their ARR.
Right. I've been paying myself $100-150k a year for most of that.
dimva also has his sums very wrong, 3.7 mill over 7 years is over 500k per year, you won't get that at any FAANG for a mid-level position.
GOOG has 3x'd in the past 7 years, FB has 10x'd, AMZN has 10x'd, etc. The initial stock grants would be worth a lot more, plus all the refreshers. My friends who are decent software engineers with a few years of experience are getting offers in the >$500k range right now.

And I'm assuming that he would have been promoted at some point. I am comparing what someone with his skills could have earned at a FAMANG, not what an average software developer would earn (they wouldn't even be able to get a job there tbqh).

> My friends who are decent software engineers with a few years of experience are getting offers in the >$500k range right now. ... not what an average software developer would earn...

Which is it? "Decent" developers being courted with $500k+ offers or "average" developers can't get jobs?

That's no different than me buying GOOG/FB/AMZN stock at the time of the grant, it's nothing more than betting on the stock market.
might not be a fair comparison if you consider taxes on salary+rsu vs. being taxed on capital gains.
I imagine he paid himself a salary during that time, and 3.7/7 would be >$500k/y which is >mid level at a FANG+ company.
This reminds me of a recently decried point the British government made encouraging people in the arts to consider technical jobs: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/12/ballet-danc...

Josh seems to be extremely entrepreneurial and independent (https://joshpigford.com/projects) and maybe being a part of a trillion dollar machine isn't worth the $ to him. He succeeded doing what he wanted to do and that's fantastic.

Admittedly, people's attitudes to work differ immensely and being able to live the entrepreneurial life is a privilege, but from my POV, you only live once, so $3.7m made from several years of doing things your own way would handily beat even $10m made from several years of employment (and neither are guaranteed).

$500k is staff/principal level compensation at FAANG companies. No way mid-level engineers make as much.