[rleahy22]

> Especially without further explanation than a wall of citations that I'm not going to bother chasing because I know the claim is false

If you refuse to read the evidence cited, how could you possibly validate or refute your position?

[dnautics]

Read carefully: I'm refusing to read it unless you give me a compelling short synopsis. Why? I'm not going to read just a bunch of links that you throw at me. I want you to at least show me some indications that you have spend some effort thinking about it, especially after you've made a claim that is trivially refutable by personal experience.

If a flat-earther just gave you a wall of links, would you read it? No. You would demand at least a short synopsis of why these are compelling reads.

[rleahy22]

Isn't the article and points made within, the short synopsis?