[code4tee]

Inkjets are just not great printers, especially if you print infrequently. Laser printers used to be an expensive luxury but they’ve long since become a commodity. Get a half decent laser printer and it will work fine even if you only print once a month.

[dragontamer]

Okay, I think lasers > inkjets for most people. But its dangerous to generalize.

Inkjets consistently make higher-resolution photos than lasers at the same price point. As you approach photo-quality, you can probably get very good photos from a $500 inkjet, and commercial quality photos from a $1000 inkjet.

I don't know of any laserjet that approaches that quality. Instead, laserjets main advantage is the simpler and cheaper to use toner. At the $300 price point, laser jets are just cheaper to maintain and use over ink.

--------

Now there's a bunch of $100 to $200 ink printers (and laser printers) which have even worse attributes. Since most $100 printers seem to be inkjet, I think people rightfully give them a bad reputation.

But at higher price points, a 11-ink printer is the only way you're going to get anything near photo-quality. (Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000).

[code4tee]

Agree, but I’d consider the photo quality printing to be more of an edge case for most users. If one just occasionally prints a few photos there are other inexpensive services available. But if that is the use case then yes I’d agree inkjet is better.

[xienze]

> Inkjets consistently make higher-resolution photos than lasers at the same price point.

But you get photos printed at <wherever> for pennies, so who wants to buy an inkjet and the fancy photo paper?

[asciimov]

Unless your really need to print huge amounts of photos, most people would be better served by having their photos printed at a store or through an online service.

[dragontamer]

You could also buy print-jobs through an online service for forms and stuff, which is probably cheaper than buying a printer.

So why buy a printer at all? Well, because of the convenience factor primarily. Buying from a store (or online service) requires driving, and/or waiting for the mail to arrive.

When scrapbooking, or doing other projects with photos, its far more convenient to know that you have a printer that can instantly make a copy of any photo in your entire digital library. You don't necessarily know what photo you want yet, you may need to lay out a few pages in the scrap book before you know what you want.

--------

In any case, a "community printer", ie: the local library, is probably best for people who only need a few documents a year.

I think leveraging your local library resources is a skill that any adult should know how to do as well. When your documents grow beyond the ability for your local library, that's when you get your own printer.

[Tijdreiziger]

Except that laser printers are huge, which is very much not ideal if you live in an apartment and only print once a month.