[sandworm101]

In an ideal world carriers wouldn't have a say in what software updates were installed on my phone. Comcast doesn't control the software on the computers it services. Why should Telus control what updates are made available for my phone?

[freeone3000]

Because they're the ones who push updates over the cell network. Comcast absolutely controls what software you run on your modem. You can update "out of band" manually, at least on recent Android Pixel phones. Any other manufacturer could also make their updates public, but since installing the one not for your carrier band makes the phone unusable as a phone, it's not likely to be common.

[fishtacos]

Comcast has 0 control over what runs on my modem (Spectrum in my case). As long as the modem is DOCSIS compliant, it will work.

The same applies to unlocked phones. The service provider has 0 control over what I am running on that phone, and they don't control the updates (the OEM does), but as long as the baseband firmware complies with established standards, the phone will work. This was mandated by law some years back in the US and I am certain it's been the case in the EU for longer.

What you seem to be referring to is telco customized phones (subsidized ones), and in those cases you'd be correct.

[ocdtrekkie]

Because security and privacy is the compromise Google made for dominance: Letting OEMs and carriers do what they want is what sold them on Android.

I'd absolutely agree that this is a design error though: We'll be better off when Android is dead and gone as a platform.

[young_unixer]

Can't you buy hardware directly and then just put the carrier's SIM card?