|
|
|
|
|
by freefal
2047 days ago
|
|
It could be that 825GB is the typical marketing GB (i.e., 1000^3) and the 667GB is the OS reported GB (i.e., 1024^3). That difference only reduces the 825 "marketing" GB to 768 "real" GB. So still a 100GB of OS/system files, which seems large, as you say. |
|
Just because computers are based on binary doesn't mean it was ever a good idea to redefine the meaning of those prefixes.