Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by aeternum 2046 days ago
I'd also be surprised if it brings in anywhere near the quoted amount since the SF supervisors have proven themselves incapable of considering second order effects such as companies contracting out their low-pay roles or simply leaving SF.
4 comments

Pretty hard to claim this when Visa decided to massively expand their Global HQ in San Francisco after Prop C passed.

The pandemic has thrown things in a wrench, but prior to the pandemic, San Francisco businesses were constrained only by commercial real estate. There was literally no space left to put any new businesses.

We've been collecting Prop C revenues since March 2019, and they are exactly as forecast.

A gross receipt tax is relatively difficult to evade. A company generally cannot avoid the SF tax without also foregoing the associated SF revenue.
> SF supervisors have proven themselves incapable of considering second order effects

Correct. SF and its politics cannot be saved, just let them slowly eat themselves.

this is a tax on high pay roles, so I don't understand your concern. Also I hope and pray that it would cause companies to move, that is essentially working towards the same goal.
if it was profitable, it would have happened already.
Two economists walk down a road and they see a twenty dollar bill lying on the side-walk. One of them asks “is that a twenty dollar bill?” Then the other one answers “It can’t be, because someone would have picked it up already,” and they keep walking.