Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scarmig 2047 days ago
I would say that Millikan had a fundamentally true insight, and he published it to the world with an experiment whose results weren't reproducible.
1 comments

Exactly. Which renders the logic behind the experiment false. But since the insight was true, it eventually led to experiments that yielded true results. (Notice I didn't say the insight was false, I supported your idea by emphasizing that even false insights can be useful.)