[dathinab]

I wonder why it's flagged, the article is clearly trying the best to be reasonable impartial.

It's also well known that sometimes, in some countries maybe more then others, decisions wrt. children are biased toward mother's.

I have seen one such case in my environment myself.

I belive it is important that such Curt decisions are based on the combination of the situation both parents are in and guidelines in a impartial non gender specific way.

Through just to be clear while I have seen one such case myself I also have seen many cases with very reasonable decisions (in Germany).

[SiempreViernes]

Did you read that comic at the start and get the impression the judge ruling in favour of the mother to get money from a webdeveloper was a impartial account of events?

[etergri]

Unjustified flagging. This is NO misogynist article: there is A CLEAR reason why judges are biased towards mothers (I'm speaking for Italy) and this has NOTHING TO DO WITH GENDER. Read it all before flagging (unless you're an italian magistrate, in that case I definitely know why you did it).

[blackbear_]

How about the other 4000 words below the comic?

[jaclaz]

Personally, I don't understand why it is flagged (there is IMHO no reason for flagging), but I have rarely seen a more unilateral and partial report.

[etergri]

Every single point is verifiable actually. Take a look at the sentences on https://www.altalex.com/ (Italian knowledge required). You'll find that this is no 'partial' report, it's just stating the reality and trying to find a logical reason other than "the judges are just racist against men", which of course sounds a bit silly.

[mixmastamyk]

I looked for the vouch link but couldn’t find it.

Anyone who is interested in the subject should watch the “red pill” documentary.

[talentedcoin]

Because it's a wall-of-text screed that's unlikely to lead to an interesting discussion on HN.

[etergri]

This basically means you didn't even read it, good job.

[talentedcoin]

I did, thank you very much, and I thought it was tendentiously-argued and bitter. There was some interesting info in there but it's hard to tell when it's peppered with comments like "in spite of other idiots" ...

[etergri]

"...who think they're always right". Thanks once again for not reading the rest.

[talentedcoin]

Seems like you have an axe to grind. Sorry if my not liking a rude, poorly-written article bothers you.

[etergri]

No axe, I'm just tired of people (mis)reading titles and being done with it.

[Dirlewanger]

It's flagged because some liberal yoyo took one look at the title and assumes it's some men's rights advocacy bullshit. It's attitudes like this that are the reason these issues are never brought up in the media.