| A very little color. Can you add anything that wasn't in the originally-posted article? For example, answers to any of these questions: Why was the accused infringer of trademarks not given specific, actionable information about the trademarks in question? You state that the reporter is required to provide additional information in many cases. Assuming this was one of those cases, why was this additional information not shared with the accused infringer? (And if this was not one of those cases, why mention this at all?) You invoke the DMCA, citing it as obligating you to take appropriate action. Was the action taken in this case the most appropriate one? Who decides what's appropriate here, Facebook or the relevant laws? Care to discuss any of your specialized tools, systems, and technology to review and properly handle IP notices? I can't speak for others, but their mere presence says little to me. No sane person expects a perfect system. We're just curious about the particular circumstances of this particular case, and you have a reasonable audience here who would love for you to share some of them. |