Can someone explain me like I'm five what's going on and where is the problem? Is author using his own old AGPL license version of code or it contains 3rd-party AGPL licensed code?
The code allegedly includes third-party code as well as contributions that were initially accepted into AGPL code, which from what I understand are technically owned by the contributor and licensed to use under AGPL.
What the guy here did is to disregard all of this and relicense it autonomously.
What the guy here did is to disregard all of this and relicense it autonomously.