[jkilpatr]

> It's a war crime to attack hospitals and the risks of escalation for nation state actors are not aligned with their incentives.

The primary point of nation-state cybercrime is that individual citizens have not yet established at any large scale if they would support a physical response to a cyber attack.

If you have a physical attack political leadership can be pretty sure the people will support them in retaliating.

But with cybercrime, without big pictures on the TV of death and destruction that support does not seem to exist. Combine this with an opposing party willing to capitalize on public doubt and inaction is a political certainty.