|
|
|
|
|
by fluffy87
2054 days ago
|
|
Why would a data scientist making >200k$/year (~1k$/ work day) spend a single second of their time trying to “workaround” something whose solution only costs 1.5k$? Spending a week/year working around ROCm would already cost you 5k$ plus the opportunity cost. For a whole team that’s a money sink. |
|
The analogy is that everyone should get NVIDIA Ampere units (non consumer) units worth $30k because it's fast and you'd rather be spending less time in a lab with millions of dollars in funding. insert don't be poor T Shirt reference
PlaidML is not ROCm. Nobody needs ROCm, what people need is just linear algebra well implemented with OpenCL primitives. That's what PlaidML is. And it works quite well, even on those integrated Intel GPUs on most laptops.
Have you also looked at DirectML and WSL2? They seem to be running tensorflow quite well too. Those things may be the key to bringing these in adoption outside the well paid class of data scientists you came up with.