|
|
|
|
|
by reificator
2063 days ago
|
|
Sure, that's better wording, but I also don't think this method solves inertia because of the two minute restriction. What this seems to do is remove inertia stemming from being overwhelmed with options by clarifying what actually needs to be done. |
|
I also see that effort it takes to get started on a thing as similar to "excitation energy" in chemistry -- that discrete amount of energy, below which, the system will not change, and above which, bam! it all happens!
By understanding the "next action" you're lowering the "excitation energy" requirement. But that's not a great metaphor to use with the general public. This is why James Clear writes the books, and I just writes the comments.