BASIC programming ironicly may return better results than if you search for something about a more mainstream current language e.g. python. I often find the first few results are some search engine spam... tutorialspoint or geeksforgeeks etc, when a link to the API would be the logical first result. (Usually the first link to the api is for 3.4 or some random version also)
I've often wondered if any metallurgists have tried to run computer simulations of the annealing process. How would you find their research if they had?
Actually yes :) At least the optimization crowd don't use the phase 'heat treatment', which helps somewhat. But who I really feel bad for is the recruiters trying to hire a chemist who specialises in the element lead.
I don't know whether they actually do it but it seems really easy to treat "BASIC" as a distinct idiomatic token from "basic" when the searcher bothers to get the casing right.
* BASIC Programming : 7 Steps - Instructables
* Learn More - Just BASIC
* The History of the BASIC Programming Language
* Programming in BASIC: the absolute beginner tutorial
* FreeBASIC Language | Home
* PureBasic - A powerful BASIC programming language
* Quite BASIC — fun, learning and nostalgia
* World of Spectrum - Documentation - ZX Spectrum manual
Only after all that is a non-basic link
* Introduction | Programming for Beginners