[textgel]

A) A large number of people have had their wellbeing put at risk due to placing sensitive information about themselves in a location that was compromised.

B) mostlove pointed out that this would give reason not to continue doing this in future.

We have two statements here.

These two statements when examined closely might have a connection between one another don't you think?

Could it be the case that there might be a possible rational connection between them both? That perhaps the consequences of the first might lead to the second? That a rational adult with an IQ in single digits or greater might be able to understand basic cause and effect, and that looking at a certain statement (lets pick a random one and say statement A) might lead to certain conclusions such as (lets pick at random again and pick B). Could it be that a basic understanding of human behaviour (Thing causes damage to human > human avoid thing) could have led to this conclusion being drawn?

Or would such a concept require further elaboration and perhaps diagrams to help those unable to grasp it?