[marvy]

> maybe even win with

In a U.S. court? You really think so? If you're right then in my opinion that's proof that the law needs fixing.

[Shared404]

It's the "Imbalance of money" part that's critical to that.

And unfortunately, yes. I think so.

Remember, Google v. Oracle has hit the Supreme Court. The only reason it's gone on so long is both sides can afford to keep throwing money at it.

What happens when one side can't?

[gamblor956]

Counterpoint: in the dancing baby case, Prince lost.

Money is less important to the outcome of a trial than people think it is.

[junon]

IMO it's chance. Depends very much on the judge, which unfortunately all have a different take on the law.