|
|
|
|
|
by sudosysgen
2069 days ago
|
|
The big issue that's missing are stacked exposure RAW files with gyroscope and accelerometer data. When that becomes available, then yes the possible processing on a computer will match and exceed what can be done on a phone. If any camera would be able to do it, I'd bet on the Sony A9iii or A7iv. |
|
It does seem like it's high time for there to be some kind of RAW-over-time standard, e.g. a single file with 2 hours of exposure that Photoshop would have built-in tools to manage -- and even the ability to handle matrix transformation movement over time, e.g. to photograph stars over 5 minutes.
I wonder how useful it would be to embed gyroscope/accelerometer data with it though? Everything I imagine having to do with long/stacked exposures involves a tripod.
Motion data actually seems like it would be more useful to embed in regular-exposure RAWs, since it could help build a deconvolution kernel to undo motion blur.