|
|
|
|
|
by jjk166
2066 days ago
|
|
That's the government coercing you, not microsoft. I'm sure microsoft doesn't mind a captive market, but if the government decides to use slack or whatever instead, you're going to switch over to slack regardless of any protest from microsoft. The companies which seem to benefit the most from the government's power are the ones which would suffer the most from losing the government's current favor. They must bend over backwards to stay in the government's good graces, not the other way around. |
|
I'm sure courts can properly resolve this, after a few months, if it did happen ....
It's the government coercing me to comply with Microsoft's TOS that's the problem.
> They must bend over backwards to stay in the government's good graces, not the other way around.
Of course, but they pay for the government's good graces by e.g. giving them free access to all hosted data -- not by making sure the users are well taken care of..