|
|
|
|
|
by bawolff
2061 days ago
|
|
How do you possibly have a patent on that. That's pretty much the oldest proposal for dealing with spam in existence. Bitcoin is even based on something called HashCash, which is roughly the same thing minus the refundability. |
|
Re: minus the refundability
The refundability is the main thing that allowed us to patent this. HashCash, and the large PoW required by Bitcoin are meant to strain any attempt to transact on the respective network. Ours only strains bad callers (monetarily) and does not strain good callers.
The argument we presented was that good/bad callers can be simplified as calls that lasts more/less than some time threshold.
Simple, user-friendly, intuitive, and serves the purpose of disincentivizing high volume spam calls while giving legit unknown callers a chance to bypass the blind filter.