If I remember correctly, they’re written by the original zeromq author. He has a blog post about how he realized that C++ was not ideal for the architecture he was using, and decided to make a clean break.
Problem is - nng is also hardly being updated. I was really hopeful for a C library that would by on par with ZeroMQ but every time a new project comes along that needs some sort of message bus and I have the time to evaluate the technology, ZeroMQ simply wins.
His arguments are valid [1] but I still don't understand why that means dropping C++ entirely. Sure, C++ isn't a perfect superset of C, but you could mostly write C-style code in C++, right?
I've seen this sentiment before from C enthusiasts. Maybe it makes sense on the Linux kernel, where you don't want to keep telling contributors not to use the most common C++ features.
But I don't think it makes sense on very small projects, and maybe I just draw the dividing line for where it stops working at a different size of project than he did.
[1] Exceptions suck and constructors suck and C++ would be better if it was just Rust with no borrow-checker.
Edit: Found it. https://250bpm.com/blog:4/