|
|
|
|
|
by YeGoblynQueenne
2060 days ago
|
|
>> Insofar is I have an issue with your comment, it is that it is not going
anywhere, as I explained in my previous post. I see this god-moding of my comment as a pretend-polite way to tell me I'm
takling nonsense, that seems to be designed to avoid criticism for being rude
to one's interlocutor on a site that has strong norms against that sort of
thing, but without really trying to understand why those norms exist, i.e.
because they make for more productive conversations and less wasting of
everyone's time. You made a comment to say that unless I claim that X (which you came up with),
then my comment is not going anywhere. The intellectually corteous and honest
response to a comment with which one does not agree is to try and understand
the reasoning of the comment. Not to claim that there is only one possible
explanation and therefore the comment must be wrong. That is just a straw man
in sheep's clothing. And this is not surprising given that it comes at the heels of nitpicking
about supposedly important terminology (necessarily!). This is how
discussions like this one go, very often. And that's why they should be
avoided, because they just waste everyone's time. |
|
Meanwhile, in a branching thread, I had a short discussion with the author of the post I originally replied to, in which I agreed with the points he made there. Both of us, I think, clarified our positions and reached common ground. That is how it is supposed to go.
I did not set out to pick a fight with you, and if I had anticipated how you would take my words, I would have phrased things more clearly.