Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by viraptor 2064 days ago
I'm not sure why the licensing would impact the app in any way. They could swap the backend, keeping the better app. The background video is just one feature to add compared to trying to fix the YTM many problems.
1 comments

Point taken. Maybe this was just one of many factors? I could also see that Google had products that were overlapping (Youtube and GPM), and they decided to merge them, and this is the way they did it?

I definitely had friends that used Youtube as a poor-mans spotify and would just keep the videos playing in the background on their desktop.

spoiler Big rant below:

> I could also see that Google had products that were overlapping (Youtube and GPM), and they decided to merge them, and this is the way they did it?

If it's the way they did, it was one of the worst ways anyone could think of. It baffled me how so many smart minds can work at Google and take so many terrible decisions at the same time.

This was just one in several equally stupid decisions they did. They could have dominated the messaging market by now, but they threw out that chance several times.

Sometimes I think it might have been on purpose. Maybe they are afraid to dominate too many markets at the same time and avoid a anti trust lawsuit? Because otherwise it literally makes no sense. Either this or they need to feed their stupid hierarchical loop giving senseless promotions to whoever creates a new thing that nobody asked for by destroying another thing that people were starting to use and like.

Ah, so that's probably the reason behind the incredibly grating "Are you still watching?" modal interrupting the video.