[eigenspace]

Honestly, I think your opinion is unpopular because it demonstrates a serious lack of understanding or thought.

If you re-use the same password for all sites, it takes just one sketchy site being compromised for all of your other sites to become compromised. In the case of a password manager, the manager itself is the one that needs to be compromised, and you have more reason to trust them to avoid being compromised than some other random site. Some random sketchy website being hacked doesn't need to effect the rest of your network of logins if you use a manager.

Most password managers (such as 1password) won't let anyone from any machine access your stored passwords over the web by just supplying your single password. They require multiple extra steps that are quite limiting, so for the most part they first need access to a computer that you've already installed your password manager on.

Furthermore, if your password manager is compromised, you have a very clear path to your password on that manager, and then a list of all the websites, usernames and passwords that you need to change in order to regain secruity. By contrast, I'm still rediscovering old websites I used 10 years ago that used my old omni-password which was compromised.

[xur17]

> If you re-use the same password for all sites, it takes just one sketchy site being compromised for all of your other sites to become compromised.

And speaking as someone that operates a website accepting passwords, this happens more than you'd think. There are hackers that actively try leaked lists of username / passwords against websites using botnets. If your password is leaked by one website, people will attempt to reuse it on other websites.

[29athrowaway]

Your mistake is assuming I had not thought of that. I have, and my position remains the same.

[eigenspace]

Then you should explain why you think what you think instead of just throwing around self proclaimed "unpopular opinions" without any explanation.

With the information you've provided (i.e. none), it really just looks like an uninformed opinion.

Why do you think the points I listed above don't make password managers more secure than password reuse?

[luhn]

Do you have a counterpoint, or do you have this opinion solely for the sake of having a contentious opinion?

[29athrowaway]

Using a password manager is a good idea.

Using a password manager as a service is my point of contention.

[luhn]

You still haven't substantiated your opinion in any way.

[dylan604]

What if service goes away?

Even if stand alone app vendor goes away, the app still works. There are things that I see are okay as a monthly service like Netflix or other content provider where the content is literally changing month to month.

Stand alone software that rarely changes, like 1Pass, does not warrant a monthly service fee from me. I am self-hosting the content, so I don't need their cloud services.

[ajford]

Playing devil's advocate here, but the service fee (at least to my mind) is more for the maintenance & upkeep of the infra.

I'd gladly move to self-hosting if it was only me. But after a few months, I was able to convince my wife to use it for convenience and security. So if there's an issue with the self-hosted version, it wouldn't just be me impacted, but my wife. And that's an SLA you don't wanna break. :D

Also, while I know I could probably do a decent job securing the hosting server, I would rather not have that on my mind. That's not my day-job, so I'll leave it to a team of people who are paid to do that.

Lastly, the service fee is $60/yr, but for sake of argument, lets call it $100. That's 2hrs of my time at my hourly pay. If setting up a self-hosted version takes me more than 2hrs to get it running, it's not worth my time.

[29athrowaway]

Because it's a service many things can happen.

Hacking aside... these are many ways in which it can go wrong:

- There can be an outage and you get locked out of your keys. You can have a connectivity issue to the service.

- The service can be discontinued or they could randomly terminate your account based on some automated system decision by mistake, sometimes with no right to appeal...

- They can change leadership and start mismanaging the service, or start selling your data like the services you use and such.

- They can start cutting corners and rushing unsafe things live.

- They can offshore all their development and reboot the team somewhere cheaper, at the expense of introducing defects during the transition.

- They can be ordered by a government to have a backdoor.

- There can be disgruntled employees, infiltrators, bad hires, malicious employees, etc...

And finally, they're a famous service that is known to have the keys to many other systems. This makes it very lucrative for a black hat to attempt to hack them. Even smart, dedicated people are not safe from 0day vulnerabilities that nobody know they exist.

Many things can go wrong. And what happens when they do? you can get locked out of essential services you need, or someone can ruin your life, force you to pay a ransom or even make you homeless if they wanted to.

Then, there are other aspects I don't like much. You can set a secure password, but then your browser will ask you to remember it. Some services allow you to skip MFA in a trusted computer... so then all your stuff is simply behind physical access to one of the trusted devices.

I don't know, it just doesn't feel right to me.

And by the way: I started by saying it's an opinion. It's an unpopular, provocative opinion, but I was honest enough to communicate it was indeed an opinion. I did not say it was a fact. Opinions are subjective, facts are not.

[eigenspace]

Regarding outages, services such as 1Password allow you to locally save your keys. An outage might interrupt synchronization, but you won't lose access.

As far as the other concerns, I'd say these concerns are all present in the 'single password re-use' strategy as well, except instead of choosing one single company to trust over your stuff, you now have to trust every single website you log into to safeguard your passwords, lest a malicious actor gets access to everything.

I agree there are downsides to services, but I disagree very strongly that the situation with services are no better than just re-using a password.

[yreg]

Even though you thought of ways in which A is more secure than B, your position that B is just as secure as A remains?

Also: What is, in that case, the proper solution ordinary people should follow?