|
|
|
|
|
by jariel
2070 days ago
|
|
"There are lots of things out there that have little to no intrinsic value (like currency)" ??? Most currencies are backed by something. USD's are backed by TBills, Euros are backed by some kind of asset. "There's lots of things with fundamentally no intrinsic value " like what? Gold and Diamonds people wear as jewelry, and they have other uses. Platinum, were it plentiful, means we might have all shifted to fuel cells 2 decades ago. Gold probably has an inflated price due to it's historical value as 'money' - but outside of that, there's basically nothing that people put significant amounts of money in without some kind of intrinsic value. |
|
Oh yeah? And what assets are these exactly? It sounds to me like you're just describing things without intrinsic value that are "backed" by other things without intrinsic value. There is no economist that would tell you that government currencies or bonds have "intrinsic value"; they're just paper. Their value can go entirely to zero (and this has happened many times in the past).
> "There's lots of things with fundamentally no intrinsic value " like what?
Anything collectible has no inherent value. Think baseball cards, art, whatever. They're worth money only because they're rare and people are willing to pay big for them. But the actual intrinsic value of the materials in a rare painting worth hundreds of millions of dollars might be a few bucks at best.
And yes, precious metals do have intrinsic value as defined by economists. Currency doesn't.