|
|
|
|
|
by parsley27
2061 days ago
|
|
The author mentions what may be an effective way of viewing SRE, that it's only for the most critical of systems that SRE would run, but doesn't mention clearly a secondary goal of SRE (in my opinion), which is to standardize and support teams running their own products. Having worked for a company where outages have clearly defined revenue loss amounts in the hundreds of thousands per hour, the biggest issue to implementing SRE was around the IT as a Cost Centre model, not anything wrong with SRE itself. |
|
I think the more companies rely on technology, the more screwed they are, because they don't realize how much harder it is to run a business dependent on technology. The fact that SRE exists proves that, I think. The system is by default a garbage fire, because by default you can't push back on product in order to fix your tech debt. Most other businesses seem to grasp the concept that they need to perform maintenance on their machines or they won't be in business for long, but as soon as it's "the magical box with the 0s and 1s inside", they pretend it doesn't require long term investment or a different strategy.