|
|
|
|
|
|
by triceratops
2065 days ago
|
|
|
> Blocking content on a political basis as a non-internet content provider would be more than enough to get you treated as a publisher. The key point here is "in pre-section 230 law". Prodigy Services was one the cases that prompted Congress to pass Section 230. Why cite outdated cases to try to prove your point? What's next, Dred Scott v. Sandford? |
|
|