|
|
|
|
|
by bayindirh
2070 days ago
|
|
> Ubuntu has a much better track record of actual security maintenance over the long term. Debian has 24 hour security fixes for 15+ years. It also supports "OldStable" in terms of security & backports. For some time it also has "Long Term Support" teams which supports older releases. Debian is "the original" install & forget distro. Ubuntu has some commercial sauce over it but, unless you have a special need, Debian can handle everything you throw at it. We have so much servers so that we sometimes forget some of our background service servers' and they hum all-along with all security updates applied. |
|