|
|
|
|
|
by OzCrimson
2066 days ago
|
|
It's just unbelievable ... how people KNOW about situations that they weren't in and don't ask any questions. But since you brought it up I can tell you about my accuracy in Excel: - The process involved 2 people checking my work before it was sent to payroll. And we did catch and correct mistakes. We were able to trace back where and how the mistakes were make, and build in ways to prevent or flag future mistakes. - The job was necessary because of all the garbage in the database. Excel's data-checking and data-cleansing and flexibility was superior to the database. - After 1 year all of my work was audited. For several dozen sales people, there was ONE person I wasn't 100% accurate with. And that one was off by 0.5%. SUCCESS! - If we'd gone with the report coming out of the database, things would have been such a confused mess. |
|
But ok. So what you are saying your Excel was reviewed by somebody else. How is this any different from reviewing somebody else’s code?
I work in a company where even the least technical analysts are capable of using numpy. We have libraries to use Google Sheets as input-output data. So you get the best of the two worlds.
What does Excel resolve here?