[gowld]

Are anonymous trolls "information content providers"?

An easy fix is to say that an "information content provider" must be a legal person who is liable for their content. Then it's easy to find where the buck stops for a Tweet or a Rip-off Report or a Revenge Porn.

[incompatible]

Every HN profile must include a real name, verified by legal documents? I think they do that already in China.