|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
2065 days ago
|
|
> You think we can here in this thread all agree to what it means for an algorithm or content-removal practice to be "politically neutral"? Well, there's a simple answer, but I doubt we'll agree on it. It is impossible for a content-removal practice, algorithmic or otherwise, to be politically neutral. Any such practice will involve (whether implemented case-by-case or encoded into the design of the algorthm) judgements of a political nature and with political impacts. |
|
Right. My point is that Hawley's whole premise of a "politically appointed political neutrality committee" is absurdly transparent.