[notJim]

Is anyone else somewhat annoyed by the wink-and-a-node style this post is written in? It's like, "Hey look how scrappy we are, willing to push the limits like this, but oh, that's not appropriate for you, you had better play it safe."

[yid]

It's interesting that the tone of the blog post suggests a desperation about getting into YC, rather than the old adage of wanting to build something that people actually want to use.

It's also interesting that HN is full of people who talk about a higher education bubble, but a YC bubble mysteriously seems to be off-topic here.

(Note that I love and use a lot of YC companies)

[mrkurt]

If they're anything like me, it's not "desperation" to get into YC, necessarily, as much as the ridiculous hatred of failure. They'd probably go equally nuts for anywhere they applied, be it Harvard or Juliar or for unemployment checks.

[davidw]

Ok, but you're sort of equating 'getting into YC' with 'success'.

[ryannielsen]

I got the impression that mrkurt was implying the Grubwithus founders didn't want to fail the YC interview, not that getting into YC guaranteed Grubwithus would be successful.

[orborde]

It's success at "getting into YC".

[shii]

This reminds me of a post a long while ago from someone who basically equated getting into YC as the ultimate test for whether their company would be viable. They also hinted that the existential questions of their own self-worth were put into jeopardy when they were rejected.

[mechanical_fish]

It is indeed difficult to find a charitable way to read this post.

There's more to an apology than the words "I'm sorry". One must also make a good-faith effort to convince the other party that you're not kidding.

[allending]

Honestly, I'm pretty disgusted.