|
|
|
|
|
|
by joshuamorton
2072 days ago
|
|
|
> I also note that you ignored the latter half of my question. In case you weren't aware, the answer, currently, to the second half of your question, is that they aren't liable for a website comment, due to section 230. As for the first half of your question, the newspaper affirmatively chooses to publish the letter. That's where they get the liability. The website does not, it simply fails to censor it. |
|
|